Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00145
Original file (PD2013 00145.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX       CASE: PD1300145
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20130815
SEPARATION DATE: 20081127


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (92A10/Automated Logistics) medically separated for a lower back condition. He experienced an onset of low back pain (LBP) in 2007 during a field training exercise; which was subsequently diagnosed as degenerative disc disease with lumbar radiculopathy; and, for which he underwent surgery later that year. Post-operatively the condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The back condition, characterized as “chronic low back pain with s/p lumbar fusion with osteoarthritis” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB also identified sleep apnea, which was designated as meeting retention standards. The PEB adjudicated “spinal fusion, L5-S1, with persistent pain, without motor neurologic deficits, unresponsive to multiple therapeutic modalities” as unfitting, rated 20% citing criteria from the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The sleep apnea was not addressed by the PEB. The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “The Army only rated me for my failed back surgery; I have been diagnosed with much more including another failed surgery for a deviated septem the Army tried to fix. I have been diagnosed with TBI/PTSD which also is not in my Military rating, Sleep Apnea/Insomnia and was granted 80% disability through VA but only 20% from Army.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting back condition is addressed below. The contended sleep apnea condition, which was designated as meeting retention standards by the MEB, is likewise addressed below. The requested deviated septum and traumatic brain injury/posttraumatic stress disorder conditions were not identified by the PEB, and thus are not within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.



RATING COMPARISON:

Service IPEB – Dated 20080821
VA - (~4 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Spinal Fusion, L5-S1
 5241 20% Status Post Lumbar Decompression, Discectomy, and Fusion L5-S1 5241 20% 20090304
Sleep Apnea
Meets retention standards Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Status Post Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty 6847 50% 20090304
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Other x 6 20090304
Combined: 20%
 Combined: 60%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 90402 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ) . Right lower extremity radiculitis associated with status post lumbar decompression, discectomy, and fusion L5-S1 added 20100930 VARD as 8620 at 10% , effective 20081128.


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges the disability rating currently assigned by the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA), but must emphasize that the Disability Evaluation System has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the DVA, operating under a different set of laws. The Board considers DVA evidence within 12 months of separation only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the disability at the time of separation. The Board also acknowledges the CI’s contention for ratings of his sleep apnea condition which was determined by the MEB to meet retention standards. Disability compensation may only be offered for those conditions that cut short the member’s career. Should the Board judge that any contested condition was most likely incompatible with military, a disability rating IAW the VASRD, based on the degree of disability evidenced at separation, will be recommended.

Lower Back Condition. The CI’s back pain began in January 2007 after stopping a pallet from falling toward him. Persistent back pain associated with radiation to the right leg was evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging, which showed bilateral herniated discs with impingement of the S1 nerve roots. Electrophysiological studies disclosed bilateral L5-S2 radiculopathies, worse on the left. An L5-S1 fusion procedure was performed in June 2007. Although radicular symptoms improved post-operatively and electrophysiological studies normalized, improvement in back pain was slow and limited. The narrative summary (NARSUM) dictated 6 months prior to separation, noted that significant pain and decreased range-of-motion (ROM) persisted, causing difficulty in tying shoes. Examination revealed a slow, antalgic gait with use of a cane. Lumbar paraspinal muscle tone was increased. With repetitive motion, pain, weakness, fatigue and loss of endurance were said to be increased. However, specific measured ROM after repetition was not documented except for two planes of motion. Extension on first measurement was 15 degrees, while the average after an unspecified number of repetitions was 20 degrees. Left lateral rotation on first measurement was 50 degrees and the average after an unspecified number of repetitions was 60 degrees. Onset of pain during left lateral rotation occurred at 45 degrees during the first measurement and at an average of 15 degrees after repetition. On 6 July 2008 (5 months prior to separation), the CI was involved in a motor vehicle accident (MVA) that resulted in worsening of his LBP. A pain medicine evaluation performed on 5 August 2008 (4 months prior to separation) reported forward flexion “to about 40 degrees and extension to 10 degrees.” At the VA Compensation and Pension exam performed on 4 March 2009 (approximately 3 months after separation), the CI stated that the progress in his low back condition was lost after the MVA. Flare-ups of pain, usually from lifting, occurred once or twice per week and lasted up to 48 hours. He used narcotic muscle relaxant medications for pain. There were no periods of physician ordered incapacitation during the prior year. Examination revealed muscle spasm, but a normal gait without assistive devices. Spinal contour was not mentioned. ROM was not additionally functionally limited following repetitive ROM testing. The goniometric ROM evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.

Thoracolumbar ROM
(Degrees)
 NARSUM ~ 6 .5 Mo s . Pre-Sep VA C&P ~ 3 Mo s . Post-Sep
Flexion (90 Normal)
 60 ( 62 ) 35 ( 37 )
Extension (30)
 20 5 ( 7 )
R Lat Flexion (30)
 10 ( 8 ) 10 ( 8 )
L Lat Flexion (30)
 10 ( 12 ) 5 ( 7 )
R Rotation (30)
 45 20 ( 19 )
L Rotation (30)
 30 ( 60 ) 20 ( 22 )
Combined (240)
 175 95
Comment
 +painful motion; muscle spasm and guarding, antalgic gait +painful motion
§4.71a Rating
 20 % 20%

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB and VA assigned a 20% rating under the 5241 code (spinal fusion). The Board agreed a 20% rating was supported by muscle spasm resulting in an abnormal gait on the NARSUM exam, flexion limited to 40 degrees on the pain medicine exam, and by flexion of 35 degrees and combined ROM of 95 degrees on the VA exam. Criteria for the next higher 40% rating (forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine of 30 degrees or less, or favorable ankylosis of the entire thoracolumbar spine) were not in evidence. The Board considered rating intervertebral disc disease under the alternative formula for incapacitating episodes, but could not find sufficient evidence which would meet the 10% criteria under that formula. Board members finally debated the application of VASRD §4.45 in this case, which allows for the next higher rating if evidence of additional functional loss after repetitive motion is evident. While the NARSUM examiner stated that pain, weakness, fatigue and loss of endurance were increased after repetition, the data provided by the examiner does not support the conclusion. In addition to not specifying the number of repetitions or actual measurements performed for most planes of motion, it appears that ROM likely did not decrease (on average it actually increased) after repetition of extension and left lateral rotation. Furthermore, the VA examiner found no additional limitation after repetition. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the low back condition.

Contended PEB Conditions. The Board’s main charge is to assess the fairness of the PEB’s determination that sleep apnea was not unfitting. The Board’s threshold for countering fitness determinations is higher than the VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) standard used for its rating recommendations, but remains adherent to the DoDI 6040.44 “fair and equitable” standard. After reporting a history of difficulty sleeping during the Board process, a diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) was confirmed by a sleep study in January 2008. A titration study in February 2008 confirmed that continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) effectively relieved the condition. Due to reported intolerance to CPAP, a surgical corrective procedure (uvulopalatopharyngoplasty) was performed in June 2008. A pulmonary medicine note in August 2008 indicated the CI was “doing well” since surgery. He continued to use CPAP on a nightly basis and “feels the CPAP is still helping.” An Epworth sleepiness scale at that time was assessed as normal. Routinely OSA is not considered unfitting solely on the basis of field and operational impediments to the use of CPAP. There is no evidence in this case that OSA was associated with any unfitting impairments not corrected by CPAP. The sleep apnea condition was not profiled or implicated in the commander’s statement and was not judged to fail retention standards. The condition was reviewed by the action officer and considered by the Board. There was no performance based evidence from the record that the sleep apnea condition significantly interfered with satisfactory duty performance. The Board concluded therefore that this condition could not be recommended for additional disability rating.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the low back condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. In the matter of the contended sleep apnea condition, the Board unanimously agrees that it cannot recommend it for additional disability rating. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

UNFITTING CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Spinal Fusion, L5-S1
 5241 20%
COMBINED
 20%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130404, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record





XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


SFMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, AR20130021856 (PD201300145)


I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary
                                                      (Army Review Boards)

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02428

    Original file (PD-2013-02428.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Informal PEBadjudicated “chronic low back pain s/p L4-5 fusion w/o neurologic deficit”as unfitting rated at10%. The Board noted that the VA examination 4 months post separation indicated a forward flexion of 45degreeswhich supports a 20% rating IAW VASRD §4.71a (forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine greater than 30 degrees but not greater than 60 degrees).However, ROM values reported by the VA examiner approximately 4 months after separation are significantly worse than those...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01058

    Original file (PD2011-01058.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After Separation) – All Effective Date 20070913 Condition Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) Lumbar Spine with Chronic LBP Right Leg Neuropathy a/w DDD Lumbar Spine … Sleep Apnea Left Rotator Cuff Tear Umbilical Hernia with Recurrence Adjustment Disorder with Anxiety and Depression Code 5237 8521 6847 5299-5201 7399-7339 9440-9434 0% x 2 Rating Exam 30%* 20080325 20% **not noted 20% 20% 30% 20080325 20110309 20080325 20080325 20080518 20080325 Combined: 0% Combined: *80% * DDD, 5237 rated 30%...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00377

    Original file (PD2012-00377.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After Separation) – All Effective Date 20070913 Condition Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) Lumbar Spine with Chronic LBP Right Leg Neuropathy a/w DDD Lumbar Spine … Sleep Apnea Left Rotator Cuff Tear Umbilical Hernia with Recurrence Adjustment Disorder with Anxiety and Depression Code 5237 8521 6847 5299-5201 7399-7339 9440-9434 0% x 2 Rating Exam 30%* 20080325 20% **not noted 20% 20% 30% 20080325 20110309 20080325 20080325 20080518 20080325 Combined: 0% Combined: *80% * DDD, 5237 rated 30%...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00071

    Original file (PD-2014-00071.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00193

    Original file (PD2009-00193.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    Condition 2: Left Shoulder Using an evaluation completed four months after the time of separation from Service, the Veterans Administration (VA) rated this disability as 5201-5019 Left Shoulder Partial Rotator Cuff Tear and Impingement Syndrome at 10%. The CI received the same rating percentages from the Air Force PEB and the VA for her back and left shoulder conditions.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00230

    Original file (PD2009-00230.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    This is evidence that the CI’s back condition worsened over time but the board must rate the disability of unfitting conditions as they are at the time of separation. The CI had obstructive sleep apnea that required the use of a CPAP machine and the Commander’s letter implied that this condition had a negative impact on his daily duty performance along with his back pain. However, at the time of separation the Air Force did not separate service members simply because they were not able to deploy.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 02511

    Original file (PD2013 02511.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The rating for the unfitting spinal fusion condition is addressed below; and, no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Pre-SepVA C&P ~ At SepFlexion (90 Normal) 8 5 (84)70 Extension (30) 25 ( 23 )15 R Lat Flexion (30) 3030 L Lat Flexion (30) 3030 R Rotation (30) 3030 L Rotation (30) 3030 Combined (240) 230205 Comment +tenderness , painful motion +painful motion §4.71a Rating 10% 10%The Board directs attention to its rating recommendationbased on the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02161

    Original file (PD-2013-02161.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronic Low Back Pain Condition .The CI experienced chronic low back pain that radiated into the right leg. The VA C&P examination noted a somewhat weakened hamstring muscle but lower extremity strength was otherwise normal and gait was normal.The Board also noted that the hamstring muscle is innervated by multiple spinal nerve roots L5, S1, S2 and S3 so significant weakness from a single nerve root is not expected. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00687

    Original file (PD2011-00687.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW S/P Fusion L4-5 and L5-S1 for HNP Condition . After due deliberation, in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB fitness determination for the L2 vertebral fracture healed condition; and, therefore, no additional disability ratings can be recommended.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00078

    Original file (PD2012-00078.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A PT examination on 28 January 2008 noted a mildly antalgic gait, normal ROM and reduced girth of the left thigh as well as reduced strength in the left lower extremity (LLE). Left Knee Condition. Left Knee ROM Flexion (140 Normal) Extension (0 Normal) Comment §4.71a Rating Ortho ~17 Mo.